Skip to main content

Nezha Dashboard CVE-2026-101086

| EUVDEUVD-2026-88021 HIGH
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-09-27 VulnCheck GHSA-99pj-qr9x-4gmp
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with nezha:service:write scope
  2. Delivery
    Craft service monitor with privileged Task.Type (Command/Exec/ApplyConfig)
  3. Exploit
    Submit via service API
  4. Execution
    Dashboard dispatches task to in-scope Agents
  5. Persist
    Agent executes command / applies config
  6. Impact
    Remote code execution on monitored hosts

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated Nezha Dashboard account (before v2.3.5) holding the nezha:service:write scope; no user interaction and no admin rights are needed. Exploitation is bounded by the attacker's existing authorization scope - privileged Command/ApplyConfig/Exec tasks can only be delivered to Agents the attacker is already authorized over, so a single-user or tightly-scoped deployment sharply limits blast radius, while a multi-tenant instance that hands service:write to low-trust users is fully exposed. The limiting factor is the pre-existing authenticated, scoped account; the enabling condition is the unvalidated Task.Type accepted by the service API sharing the protobuf integer namespace with privileged operations.

Impact

This is a genuine privilege-escalation issue (CWE-269) rather than a high-CVSS-but-hollow finding, but its real-world urgency is moderate and gated by authentication. The vendor CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N, score 7.1) confirms network reachability, low complexity, and NO required user interaction, but PR:L means the attacker must already hold an authenticated account carrying the nezha:service:write scope - this is not an unauthenticated internet-facing bug. The vendor scored only VC:H with VI:N/VA:N, which UNDERSTATES the impact: the flaw lets an attacker deliver command-execution and Agent-configuration tasks to Agents, which is by definition integrity- and availability-affecting (arbitrary code execution on monitored hosts), so my independent assessment raises Integrity and Availability and treats the compromised Agents as a scope change. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - this argues against imminent mass exploitation, but the root cause (a shared protobuf Task.Type integer namespace between benign service monitors and privileged Command/ApplyConfig/Exec tasks) is conceptually simple and clearly documented in the patch/tests, lowering the bar for a motivated authenticated insider. Net: a real priority for multi-tenant Nezha deployments where low-privilege users hold service:write, and a lower priority for single-operator/self-hosted single-user instances.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privilege authenticated Nezha user who holds the nezha:service:write scope creates or updates a 'service monitor' via the service API but sets its Task.Type to a privileged value (Command, ApplyConfig, or Exec) instead of a supported probe type such as TCPPing. The dashboard dispatches the crafted task to Agents within the user's authorization scope, executing arbitrary commands or pushing malicious Agent configuration. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, though the fix commit ships security tests that concretely demonstrate the rejected task-type values.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 27, 2026

Authenticated privilege escalation in Nezha Dashboard before 2.3.5 lets any account holding the nezha:service:write scope escalate into privileged Agent operations by creating or updating a service monitor whose Task.Type is set to a command or configuration task value, since the service API never validated that the submitted type belonged to the supported probe set. Because service monitors and privileged operations share the same protobuf Task.Type integer namespace, the crafted task is accepted and dispatched to Agents within the attacker's existing authorization scope, resulting in command execution or Agent reconfiguration (CWE-269). The independent assessment rates this as a genuine but authentication-gated privilege-escalation issue whose urgency is moderate and whose blast radius scales with how broadly service:write is delegated; the vendor has released a fix in 2.3.5 (commit 38824dbc11a63964c5b9296ae4c68e62b34fa04b) and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upgrade every Nezha Dashboard instance to 2.3.5 or later; the vendor-released patch is the commit 38824dbc11a63964c5b9296ae4c68e62b34fa04b, which adds model.ValidateServiceMonitorType checks in createService and updateService and a defence-in-depth check in DispatchTask, and is documented in advisory GHSA-grrw-fx36-fv32. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, treat the exposure as an authorization-hygiene problem: revoke or tightly scope nezha:service:write so that only fully trusted operators can create or modify service monitors, since the entire exploit path is gated on a pre-existing authenticated account with that scope; audit existing Service rows for Type values that are not supported probe types (Command, ApplyConfig, Exec, or out-of-range integers) as these may be artefacts of past abuse, and note that after patching DispatchTask will simply log and drop such rows rather than executing them, so those monitors will silently stop working until corrected. Additional hardening consistent with the advisory: restrict Dashboard/API reachability to trusted networks or a reverse proxy that enforces authentication, and enable Agent-side egress restrictions so Agents can only reach the Dashboard and the endpoints they legitimately need. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so prioritisation should follow the 2.3.5 upgrade timeline rather than emergency patching, except in multi-tenant deployments that hand service:write to low-trust users, where the blast radius is effectively full command execution over the attacker's authorized Agents.

Affected VersionsENISA

nezha 0 <2.3.5

Affected Packages

euvd nezha fix: 2.3.5

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Nezha is a Go-based server and service monitoring system composed of a Dashboard (control plane) and Agents that connect back to it; control messages between the two are serialised as protobuf tasks carrying an integer Task.Type field. That single integer namespace is shared across semantically very different operations: benign service-monitor probes (for example TaskTypeTCPPing, HTTP, ICMP) and privileged administrative operations (TaskTypeCommand, TaskTypeApplyConfig, TaskTypeExec). The service-monitor API (POST /api/v1/service and PATCH /api/v1/service/:id) previously persisted whatever Type value the caller supplied and then passed it to DispatchTask, which forwards the task to the Agents covered by the service. The root cause class is CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management): a lower-privileged write scope (nezha:service:write) was able to select a task type that carries higher-privileged semantics, effectively letting a monitor definition masquerade as a remote command or configuration application. The vendor fix introduces model.ValidateServiceMonitorType and enforces it at createService (cmd/dashboard/controller/service.go), updateService, and as defence-in-depth inside DispatchTask (cmd/dashboard/rpc/service_dispatch.go) so that stale database rows or future internal callers cannot re-introduce the shared-namespace confusion. Affected products are tracked by the wildcard CPE cpe:2.3:a:nezhahq:nezha:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, i.e. all Nezha Dashboard builds prior to 2.3.5 that resolve to the vulnerable version range.

Know when Nezha gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Authenticated scoped user (PR:L) triggers command execution on separate Agent hosts, a scope change (S:C) yielding full C/I/A compromise of those Agents.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Nezha Dashboard versions before 2.3.5 fail to restrict service monitor task types to supported probe types, allowing authenticated users with nezha:service:write scope to submit privileged task types through the service API. Attackers can deliver command execution or Agent configuration tasks to Agents within their authorization scope by exploiting the shared protobuf Task.Type namespace between service monitors and privileged operations.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), with the advisory also citing CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization).

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Nezha Dashboard deployments running versions before 2.3.5 contain a privilege-escalation flaw that lets an account already holding the nezha:service:write scope issue command and configuration tasks to managed Agents, crossing from routine service monitoring into control-plane operations. Because the flaw routes a crafted service monitor into the same task channel used for Agent command execution and reconfiguration, the real blast radius depends on how widely that write scope has been delegated across teams, tokens, and automation. Leadership should care most where service:write has been granted beyond a small trusted group, since unauthorized commands or Agent reconfiguration could then spread across the monitored fleet.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
popular open-source self-hosted server-monitoring dashboard, niche production footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CIRCL GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in Nezha

View all
CVE-2026-101090 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Sep 27

Host header injection in Nezha 2.2.3's OAuth2 redirect endpoint (/api/v1/oauth2/{provider}) allows an unauthenticated re

CVE-2026-53519 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Jun 12

Unauthenticated path traversal in Nezha Monitoring (nezhahq/nezha) before 2.0.13 allows remote attackers to read arbitra

CVE-2026-62283 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 21

Cross-tenant session hijacking in Nezha Monitoring (v1.14.13-1.14.14 and v2.0.0-2.0.9) lets any authenticated low-privil

CVE-2026-111383 HIGH
7.1 Oct 16

Resource exhaustion in Nezha 2.0.13 through 2.3.14 allows an authenticated user to open unbounded concurrent connections

CVE-2026-111387 HIGH
7.1 Oct 16

Cleartext third-party credentials are exposed to any authenticated principal holding DDNS read access in Nezha versions

CVE-2026-105113 HIGH
7.1 Oct 03

Permanent deadlock of the alerting subsystem in Nezha Dashboard 1.8.0 through 2.3.12 allows any authenticated non-admin

CVE-2026-111384 HIGH
7.1 Oct 16

Nezha monitoring dashboards running versions 1.0.0 through 2.3.14 can be knocked offline by an authenticated user who ho

CVE-2026-101085 HIGH
7.1 Sep 27

Denial of service in the Nezha monitoring dashboard before 2.3.8 lets any authenticated non-administrator account crash

CVE-2026-59155 MEDIUM
6.9 Jul 10

Nezha Monitoring versions prior to 2.2.5 expose stored third-party API credentials in plaintext through two listing API

CVE-2026-53523 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Jun 12

Host header injection in Nezha Monitoring versions 1.0.0 through 2.2.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to redire

CVE-2026-53522 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jun 12

Unbounded WebSocket stream allocation in Nezha Monitoring versions 1.0.0 through 2.1.x allows any authenticated dashboar

CVE-2026-53520 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jun 12

Nezha Monitoring versions 2.0.14 through 2.1.0 (exclusive) allows any authenticated user to exploit the NAT-based Host c

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy