Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconObtain valid Mail Assure tenant SMTP credentials
-
DeliveryConnect to shared relay SMTP TCP port
-
ExploitAuthenticate via SMTP AUTH with own tenant account
-
InstallSpecify victim tenant's domain in MAIL FROM envelope
-
C2Relay accepts and forwards spoofed message
-
ExecuteRecipient MTA validates SPF/DMARC against shared relay (passes)
-
ImpactDMARC-compliant phishing email delivered to target
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Anti-spoofing controls
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires possession of a valid SMTP AUTH credential for any tenant account on the N-able Mail Assure shared relay - exploitation is limited to authenticated tenants (PR:L); unauthenticated external actors and users without a Mail Assure account cannot exploit this. No elevated tenant privilege, administrative access, or non-default configuration is required beyond basic sending access. The attacker must know or guess a target tenant's domain name (trivially discoverable through MX/SPF/DMARC DNS records or public sources). Exploitation is constrained to envelope sender spoofing (MAIL FROM); the attack does not grant access to victim tenant mail data, account settings, or system resources. Recipient servers enforcing strict SMTP envelope inspection beyond SPF/DMARC (e.g., S/MIME signing, custom header validation, or relay-source allowlisting) may partially mitigate the deception but would not prevent message delivery. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.3 score (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) accurately captures the authentication requirement and limited direct integrity impact in metric terms, but meaningfully understates the real-world phishing and business email compromise (BEC) exposure enabled by the SPF/DMARC bypass - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in gliwice hosting their domain through an MSP's Mail Assure deployment could find their brand silently weaponized by a co-hosted malicious tenant to send DMARC-passing phishing campaigns targeting their own clients. No EPSS data is included in the available intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and no automated exploit framework is documented, but the attack requires only basic SMTP knowledge and a valid tenant credential - low technical barrier. The researcher gist reference (https://gist.github.com/alessandrobertoldi/1ebe0f48aa0119d787ac0ff710057d92) appears to demonstrate the behavior but is not labeled as a POC in NVD data. The vendor's explicit acceptance of this as intended behavior is the most significant risk-amplifying signal: there will be no remediation from the vendor side, and tenants must independently mitigate or migrate. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who is a legitimate Mail Assure tenant in good standing connects to the shared SMTP relay's TCP port, performs SMTP AUTH with their own valid credentials, and issues a MAIL FROM command specifying a victim co-hosted tenant's domain. The relay accepts the message without validating domain ownership and delivers it to external recipients, where the message passes SPF and DMARC checks because the relay infrastructure is the authorized sender for all hosted domains. The attack requires no special tooling - standard SMTP client commands suffice, and the researcher gist appears to provide a concrete demonstration. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 14, 2026
Cross-tenant SMTP sender spoofing in N-able Mail Assure (all versions through April 2026) permits any authenticated tenant to specify arbitrary MAIL FROM envelope addresses - including domains belonging to other co-hosted tenants - without the relay enforcing any domain-to-account ownership binding. Because the shared relay is itself listed in the SPF records and DMARC policy of every hosted tenant domain, spoofed outbound messages pass SPF and DMARC validation at recipient mail servers, giving the attack the appearance of fully authorized email. N-able has publicly stated this is intended behavior of its shared relay architecture, making no vendor patch expected. A researcher demonstration gist has been published, and no public exploit or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch is expected: N-able has publicly stated that the absence of per-tenant sender-domain binding is intended behavior of its shared SMTP relay architecture. Affected tenants should implement DMARC aggregate (rua) and forensic (ruf) reporting on their hosted domains immediately, as DMARC reports from recipient mail servers will surface unauthorized use of their domain in MAIL FROM fields. Organizations at elevated phishing risk (financial services, legal, healthcare) should evaluate migrating outbound relay to a service or self-managed infrastructure that enforces per-account envelope sender restrictions. Where N-able provides account-level configuration, tenants should inquire whether any egress sender domain allow-listing can be applied at the relay layer. Awareness of this shared-tenancy limitation should be disclosed to downstream clients of MSPs operating Mail Assure so that they can calibrate trust in email received from Mail-Assure-hosted senders. The researcher disclosure can be found at https://gist.github.com/alessandrobertoldi/1ebe0f48aa0119d787ac0ff710057d92 and the DeepSec presentation at https://deepsec.net/speaker.html#PSLOT782.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
N-able Mail Assure is a managed email security and continuity platform delivered primarily through the managed service provider (MSP) channel, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:n-able:mail_assure:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The product operates a shared SMTP relay in which multiple customer tenants route outbound mail through common infrastructure. The flaw is architectural: SMTP AUTH is performed correctly at the credential level, but the post-authentication authorization step - verifying that the authenticated account is permitted to use the submitted MAIL FROM domain - is absent. This maps to CWE-290 (Authentication Bypass by Spoofing), where authentication of the user does not translate into authorization over the claimed identity. The critical amplification factor is SPF and DMARC: the shared relay holds DNS-level sending authority for all hosted tenant domains, so spoofed messages are not rejected by standard email authentication controls at the destination. The design conflates relay authentication with sender identity authorization, a gap common in shared relay architectures that lack per-tenant envelope sender restrictions.
Know when Mail Assure gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Requires authenticated tenant access (PR:L); no confidentiality or availability impact; spoofing integrity impact is limited and scoped to the relay session.
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
DescriptionCVE.org
N-able Mail Assure through April 2026 contains a design-level authorization flaw that allows an authenticated SMTP user to send outbound email using MAIL FROM addresses belonging to other tenants. When connecting to the SMTP TCP port and performing SMTP AUTH with valid credentials, the server accepts arbitrary sender domains without enforcing any domain-to-account binding. As a result, an attacker from any tenant can impersonate other tenant domains, producing messages that pass SPF and DMARC validation. NOTE: N-able's position is that the behavior is intended functionality of its shared SMTP relay architecture and that the service does not represent that it enforces per-tenant sender-domain binding.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2025-210903
GHSA-8wch-g3f4-9xpr
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB