FortiClient Windows
CVE-2025-57716
HIGH
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local low-privileged account
-
DeliveryPlant malicious DLL in Online Installer folder
-
ExploitVictim runs FortiClient Online Installer
-
ExecutionInstaller loads hijacked DLL
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code in installer context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Search path element control
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation is confined to the FortiClient Online Installer variant on Windows (versions 7.4.0-7.4.3, 7.2.0-7.2.11, and all 7.0 releases). The attacker must already possess a local low-privileged account on the host and have write access to the FortiClient Online Installer installation folder to drop the malicious DLL. Critically, the planted DLL only executes when the online installer is actually run (UI:R) - so exploitation depends on an operator or deployment process launching the installer, ideally at higher privilege for the attacker to gain anything. Limiting factors: no remote vector (AV:L), an existing local foothold is mandatory, the standard/non-online installer path is not indicated as affected, and the window of opportunity is tied to installer execution rather than being continuously available. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely HIGH-scored (CVSS 7.3) but comparatively low-urgency issue once all signals are weighed together. The CVSS vector itself is self-limiting: AV:L means no remote reachability, PR:L requires the attacker to already hold a low-privileged local account, and UI:R means a user (typically a more-privileged operator) must actually run the FortiClient Online Installer for the planted DLL to load. The high 7.3 is driven almost entirely by the full C:H/I:H/A:H impact of arbitrary code execution, not by ease of access. EPSS corroborates the low practical risk: 0.18% probability at the 7th percentile indicates exploitation is considered unlikely. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so this is not an active-exploitation priority. The signals are internally consistent - there is no network-vs-local conflict here, as both the description (local user placing a DLL) and the CVSS vector (AV:L) agree on local-only exploitation. Net: a real local privilege-escalation / code-execution primitive worth patching on managed endpoints, but not an emergency relative to remotely exploitable flaws. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local, low-privileged user on a Windows endpoint writes a malicious DLL into the FortiClient Online Installer installation folder. When the online installer is subsequently executed (e.g., by an administrator or an automated deployment running with higher privileges), the installer loads the attacker's DLL via an uncontrolled search path, executing attacker code in the installer's context. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis; exploitation requires an existing local foothold plus the installer being run. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
A local low-privileged Windows user can achieve DLL hijacking in the FortiClient Online Installer because the installer loads DLLs from a search path the user can write to, allowing a planted malicious DLL to run when the installer is executed. Affected builds are FortiClient Windows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, and all 7.0 releases when delivered via the Online Installer; per the CVSS vector the attack requires a local account (PR:L) and some form of user or deployment action to launch the installer (UI:R). Risk is tempered by a very low EPSS score of 0.18% (7th percentile), and no public exploit code has been identified and there is no CISA KEV entry indicating active exploitation; the assessor rates this as high-scored (7.3) but comparatively low-urgency because exploitation presupposes an existing local foothold and write access to the installer folder.
RemediationAI
Fortinet's PSIRT advisory FG-IR-25-685 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-685) is the authoritative source for the fixed FortiClient Windows builds; the exact patched version is not specified in the provided data, so administrators should consult that advisory and upgrade to the latest available 7.4.x or 7.2.x maintenance release it designates, and treat 7.0 as unsupported if no fix is offered for that branch. Where the online installer is not required, deploy the standard/offline installer package, which is not indicated as affected, and stage any installer from a directory that only privileged accounts can modify. If the Online Installer must be used, harden the installation folder with NTFS ACLs that remove write access for standard users (side effect: users who legitimately need to modify that folder, or installers run as non-admins, may fail, so the change should be tested against existing deployment tooling). Additionally, deploy the installer via a controlled, elevated management workflow rather than allowing low-privileged users to launch it, monitor the FortiClient Online Installer directory for unexpected DLL files, and detect suspicious DLL loads originating from that path as a compensating detective control. Because the assessed vector requires a pre-existing local account and write access, restricting interactive local logon and tightening endpoint privileges reduces exploitability until patching is complete.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is an Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427) issue affecting the FortiClient Online Installer on Windows, tracked under CPE cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlient:*:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*. On Windows, applications such as installers resolve dependent libraries through a defined search order that historically begins with the directory of the executing binary; if that directory is writable by a non-administrative user, the user can drop a same-named malicious DLL that the process will load and execute. Here the vulnerable element is the FortiClient Online Installer installation folder, which a local low-privileged user can write to, so a crafted DLL placed there is loaded when the online installer runs. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the local attack vector, low attack complexity, low privileges required, required user interaction, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact once the DLL executes in the installer's context. The exposure is specific to the Online Installer variant rather than the standard/offline installer path, and the window of opportunity is tied to installer execution rather than being continuously available.
Know when Forticlient gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local DLL plant needs low-privileged file-write access (PR:L) and a victim to run the installer (UI:R, AV:L); the loaded DLL yields full code execution, so C/I/A:H.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
An Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability [CWE-427] in FortiClient Windows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, 7.0 all versions may allow a local low privileged user to perform a DLL hijacking attack via placing a malicious DLL to the FortiClient Online Installer installation folder.
Executive ViewAI
FortiClient's Windows Online Installer, the tool used by end users and IT staff to deploy FortiClient endpoint protection across versions 7.0, 7.2 (through 7.2.11) and 7.4 (through 7.4.3), can be manipulated by any low-privileged local user to load a malicious DLL during installation, giving that user code execution in the installer's context. Because exploitation requires an attacker to already hold a local account on the endpoint and to influence when or how the installer is run, this is a privilege-escalation and persistence risk rather than a remote entry point, and it matters most for organizations with shared workstations, unmanaged local users, or ad-hoc installer distribution. Leadership should treat this as a manageable but unresolved exposure: no vendor fix is available yet, no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified, and organizational risk is concentrated in how installers are delivered and who can write to their location.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict write permissions on installer download/staging directories to administrators only so a malicious DLL cannot be planted; deploy installers through managed, privileged distribution channels rather than user-executed online installers; prefer the offline/full installer from a verified internal repository; enforce application control/DLL allowlisting and monitor endpoint telemetry for anomalous DLL loads by FortiClient installer processes; reduce the population of low-privileged users with write access to common installer paths.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
More in Forticlient
View allA privilege escalation in Fortinet FortiClient Windows 5.4.3 and earlier as well as 5.6.0 allows attacker to gain privil
The Fortishield.sys driver in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allows local users to execute arbitrary code with kernel
DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). Rated high severity (CVSS 7
DLL search-path hijacking in the FortiClient Online Installer for Windows (all versions before 6.0.6) lets an attacker w
An Information Disclosure vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient for Windows 5.6.0 and below versions, FortiClient for Ma
The qm class in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android uses a hardcoded encryption key of FoRtInEt!AnDrOiD, which ma
In FortiClientWindows 5.4.1 and 5.4.2, an attacker may escalate privilege via a FortiClientNamedPipe vulnerability. Rate
A privilege context switching error vulnerability [CWE-270] in FortiClient Windows version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.
The Endpoint Control protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android and 5.2.028 for iOS does not
Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.028 for iOS does not validate certificates, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attacke
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiClientWindows affects versions 7.2.0-7.2.11 and 7.4.0-7.4.3, exploitable by any a
An external control of file name or path vulnerability [CWE-73] in FortiClientMac version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.1
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB