Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Interaction frequency control
|
| Impact | The risk profile is moderate but should not be dismissed based on CVSS score alone. The CVSS 4.3 (Low severity) reflects partial availability impact and user interaction requirement; however, multiple signal sources provide context: SSVC assessment indicates no current exploitation (Exploitation: none), the attack is not automatable (Automatable: no), and technical impact is partial. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L) confirms remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity attack requiring user interaction-likely a social engineering vector. The absence of POC and KEV designation suggests this is not actively weaponized in the wild. However, the low attack complexity and lack of authentication requirements mean that once a user is deceived into visiting a malicious link, an attacker can execute a sustained DoS with minimal effort. For organizations running Aftermarket DPC in customer-facing or critical environments, this warrants patching; for isolated internal deployments, it is lower priority than vulnerabilities with higher technical impact or autonomous exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malicious web page or email link that, when visited by a user, triggers rapid automated requests to the HCL Aftermarket DPC server (exploiting low attack complexity and no authentication requirement). The requests consume bandwidth and processing resources faster than the application can service legitimate traffic, degrading performance or rendering the service unavailable to other users. Because user interaction is required per the CVSS vector, the attacker must first deceive the target user via social engineering (phishing, malicious advertisement, or compromised website redirect) to visit the attack page; once clicked, the attack executes autonomously. This is a practical low-skill attack suitable for resource-constrained adversaries seeking service disruption. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Mar 26, 2026
HCL Aftermarket DPC version 1.0.0 is vulnerable to excessive spamming that consumes server bandwidth and processing resources, potentially causing denial of service to legitimate users. The vulnerability requires user interaction (UI:R per CVSS vector) and is remotely exploitable without authentication, resulting in partial availability impact. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, though the low barrier to exploitation (AC:L) makes this a practical attack vector for resource exhaustion.
RemediationAI
HCL customers should consult the official vendor advisory at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0129793 for patch availability and recommended upgrade versions. Until a patched version is deployed, implement compensating controls: configure rate limiting at the network or load balancer level to restrict requests per source IP or user session, deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block spamming patterns, enforce request throttling with exponential backoff for repeated submissions from the same source, and monitor server resource utilization and request logs for anomalies indicating attack activity. If the application is exposed to untrusted networks, consider restricting access via IP allowlisting or VPN until patching is complete.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CVE-2025-55268 is classified under CWE-799 (Improper Control of Interaction Frequency), which describes inadequate rate limiting or request throttling mechanisms. HCL Aftermarket DPC (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:hcl:aftermarket_dpc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) lacks sufficient input validation or request filtering to prevent an attacker from flooding the application with repeated requests. The vulnerability stems from missing or insufficient anti-spam controls that would normally enforce per-user or per-IP request quotas, connection limits, or CAPTCHA challenges. The root cause is not a flaw in an underlying library but rather incomplete implementation of resource protection mechanisms in the application's request handling layer.
Know when Hcl gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Spamming Vulnerability which can allow the actor to excessive spamming can consume server bandwidth and processing resources which may lead to Denial of Service.
Executive ViewAI
Organizations using HCL Aftermarket DPC should be aware of moderate risk from CVE-2025-55268 rated CVSS 4.3. Exploitation could compromise the security of affected deployments. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and monitor for exploitation.
Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: restrict network access and enable monitoring.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Related Vulnerabilities in HCL Aftermarket DPC Multiple Vulnerabilities
View all 8Information disclosure in HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management allows unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain sensi
SQL injection and cross-tenant data exposure flaws in HCL BigFix Service Management allow an attacker who can reach the
HCL DFXAnalytics 3.1 and earlier ship with outdated third-party libraries or sub-components that carry publicly known vu
A Boolean-based SQL injection vulnerability exists in HCL Unica that allows remote attackers to manipulate backend datab
HCL DFXAnalytics 3.1 and earlier transmit sensitive data across the network without transport encryption, allowing anyon
Command injection in HCL BigFix RunBookAI 11.2 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating syst
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) version 23 ships with an outdated, vulnerable WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) ser
HCL BigFix Service Management (SX) is affected by a Broken Access Control vulnerability leading to privilege escalation.
SQL injection in HCL Aftermarket DPC version 1.0.0 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to extract sensitive databas
Broken access control in HCL BigFix Service Management lets a low-privileged authenticated user reach administrative scr
Content Security Policy weakness in HCL Hive Telco Observability's Keycloak authentication component allows remote attac
EUVD-2025-209059
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB