Skip to main content

OpenSSL CVE-2025-5480

| EUVDEUVD-2025-17356 HIGH
Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427)
2025-06-06 zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com
7.8
CVSS 3.0 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Search path element control
Impact

The CVSS 3.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates local attack vector with low complexity and low privilege requirements, yielding a 7.8 score. However, real-world risk is moderated by the prerequisite requirement: an attacker must already have low-privileged code execution. This is not a remote vulnerability and does not grant unauthenticated access. The lack of confirmed KEV status and public POC suggests this is not currently under active exploitation. For organizations where Action1 runs with elevated privileges or in shared/multi-tenant environments, this represents HIGH priority (privilege escalation from low to SYSTEM). For isolated single-user deployments, risk is MEDIUM. The vulnerability is technically sound (CWE-427 is well-understood and exploitable) but requires a prior compromise, making it a secondary rather than primary attack vector.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker gains initial low-privileged code execution on a Windows system running Action1 (e.g., via phishing malware, compromised software, or legitimate but vulnerable application). The attacker enumerates the search path that Action1's OpenSSL integration uses to load configuration files. If Action1 searches user-writable or partially-writable directories before system directories (common misconfiguration), the attacker drops a crafted openssl.cnf file in that location. When Action1 next initializes OpenSSL (during startup or during cryptographic operations), it loads the malicious configuration, which can include engine directives, library paths, or environment variable expansions that execute attacker-controlled code in the SYSTEM context. The attacker achieves privilege escalation and can install persistence mechanisms, steal credentials, or compromise the system further. Since AC:L and UI:N, no user interaction is required—merely triggering Action1 functionality is sufficient.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation vulnerability in Action1 where an attacker with low-privileged code execution can exploit an insecure OpenSSL configuration file loading mechanism to achieve SYSTEM-level code execution. The vulnerability requires prior code execution capability on the target system but presents a direct path to full system compromise once initial access is obtained. No active exploitation or public POC has been confirmed at this time, but the moderate CVSS score of 7.8 and CWE-427 classification indicate a meaningful risk to Action1 users.

RemediationAI

  1. Apply the latest Action1 security patch when released by the vendor (reference ZDI-CAN-26767 for tracking). 2. Implement principle of least privilege: run Action1 with minimum necessary privileges, avoiding SYSTEM or Administrator context where possible. 3. Restrict write permissions to directories where Action1 loads OpenSSL configuration files (typically Windows system paths like %WINDIR%\System32 and application installation directories). 4. Use file integrity monitoring (FIM) on OpenSSL configuration files and search paths to detect unauthorized modifications. 5. Isolate Action1 processes in AppContainers or similar sandboxes if Windows version supports it. 6. Monitor process creation and library loading from Action1 for anomalies.

Affected VersionsENISA

Action1 5.216.617.1

Affected Packages

euvd action1 no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This vulnerability stems from CWE-427 (Uncontrolled Search Path Element), a path traversal weakness where Action1 loads OpenSSL configuration files from an unsecured or predictable location without proper validation. OpenSSL configuration files can contain directives that influence cryptographic operations, engine loading, and library paths. By placing a malicious openssl.cnf or related configuration file in a location that Action1's process will search before the legitimate system configuration, an attacker can inject arbitrary commands or load malicious libraries. The vulnerability likely affects Action1 versions that bundle or depend on OpenSSL without implementing proper search path restrictions. The specific CPE for Action1 would be 'cpe:2.3:a:action1:action1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*' with affected versions requiring vendor clarification.

Know when OpenSSL gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Action1 Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Action1. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.

The specific flaw exists within the configuration of OpenSSL. The product loads an OpenSSL configuration file from an unsecured location. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-26767.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Action1 installations are vulnerable to local privilege escalation attacks that could allow attackers with basic system access to gain complete administrative control. This represents a significant risk for organizations using Action1, particularly in environments where multiple users or third-party applications have local system access.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Restrict local system access through strong authentication and privilege management; disable Action1 features if not actively required; implement file system access controls to restrict modification of OpenSSL configuration files; isolate Action1 systems on network segments with limited user access; monitor process execution and file modifications in Action1 directories using endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools; enforce application whitelisting on Action1 host systems.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 94% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2014-0160 HIGH POC
7.5 Apr 07

The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe

CVE-2021-3711 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 24

In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Rated cri

CVE-2014-0195 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Jun 05

The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2016-0800 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Mar 01

The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to se

CVE-2015-0204 MEDIUM POC
4.3 Jan 09

The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k

CVE-2022-2068 HIGH
7.3 Jun 21

In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehas

CVE-2015-4000 LOW POC
3.7 May 21

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not pro

CVE-2014-3566 LOW POC
3.4 Oct 15

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which mak

CVE-2016-2107 MEDIUM POC
5.9 May 05

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a

CVE-2015-1793 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jul 09

The X509_verify_cert function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.2b, and 1.0.2c does not properly

CVE-2022-3602 HIGH
7.5 Nov 01

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Rated hig

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy