Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) indicates high real-world exploitability: network accessibility from any source (AV:N), low attack complexity requiring no special conditions (AC:L), no privileges or authentication needed (PR:N/UI:N), and high availability impact (A:H) within the affected system. The absence of confidentiality or integrity impact (C:N/I:N) limits the vulnerability to denial-of-service rather than data breach. Risk assessment synthesis: (1) High exploitability factors: unauthenticated, network-accessible attack with low complexity; (2) Infrastructure criticality: DHCP is essential for network operations, and service denial affects all clients; (3) Missing signals: EPSS probability, KEV inclusion status, and POC availability are not provided, limiting quantification of active threat landscape; (4) SSVC assessment: exploitation is likely automatable given the network nature and lack of authentication, technical impact is high (service denial), affecting mission-critical infrastructure. Conservative assessment: CRITICAL priority given infrastructure role, despite limited data on active exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker positioned on the network (or external with network access) sends a crafted sequence of malformed or excessive DHCP requests to the Windows DHCP Server (UDP port 67). The vulnerability in the protection mechanism allows these requests to consume server resources without being properly rate-limited or validated. For example: (1) Attacker floods the DHCP server with DHCP DISCOVER packets with invalid or resource-intensive payloads; (2) Server's insufficient protection mechanism fails to drop/rate-limit these packets, causing memory exhaustion, CPU saturation, or state table overflow; (3) DHCP server becomes unresponsive, preventing legitimate clients from obtaining IP leases; (4) Network-connected devices lose connectivity or experience prolonged DHCP timeout delays, cascading to application failures and business disruption. The attack requires no authentication, user interaction, or special privileges—a single attacker script can impact entire network segments. Likelihood of POC: high, given the straightforward nature of network-based DoS attacks; exploit code likely exists in security research communities or will emerge post-disclosure. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Mar 14, 2026
Network-accessible denial-of-service vulnerability in Windows DHCP Server caused by a protection mechanism failure (CWE-693), allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server availability without requiring authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability affects Windows DHCP Server implementations across multiple versions and has a CVSS severity of 7.5 (High). While the description does not explicitly reference KEV inclusion, active exploitation status, or EPSS data, the low attack complexity (AC:L) and network accessibility (AV:N) combined with no authentication requirements indicate this represents a credible denial-of-service threat to DHCP infrastructure.
RemediationAI
Immediate remediation steps: (1) Apply latest security patches from Microsoft for Windows DHCP Server—check Microsoft Security Bulletin and KB database for CVE-2025-32725 specific patch (expected in monthly Patch Tuesday releases); (2) Identify affected systems via Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager; (3) Test patches in non-production environments before broad deployment; (4) Temporary mitigations pending patches: implement network-level ingress filtering to restrict DHCP traffic (UDP 67/68) to authorized networks only, deploy rate-limiting rules on firewalls/network appliances to restrict DHCP request frequency, monitor DHCP server logs for anomalous request patterns, consider disabling DHCP Server role on non-essential systems. (5) Post-remediation: validate DHCP service stability and client connectivity after patching. Reference: Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) portal for official advisories, KB articles, and patch availability confirmation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 8 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This vulnerability resides in Windows DHCP Server, a critical network infrastructure service responsible for dynamic IP address allocation via the DHCP protocol (RFC 2131/2132 operating over UDP port 67/68). The root cause is classified under CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure), indicating insufficient safeguards against resource exhaustion, malformed packet handling, or inadequate request validation within the DHCP server's packet processing logic. The protection mechanism failure likely involves improper handling of DHCP requests that should be rate-limited, validated, or rejected, allowing an attacker to trigger excessive resource consumption (memory, CPU, or connection state). DHCP servers are fundamental network infrastructure present in virtually all enterprise environments; compromise of this service cascades to network unavailability.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Protection mechanism failure in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2025-32725 is a network-accessible denial-of-service vulnerability in Windows DHCP Server that allows unauthenticated attackers to disrupt DHCP services without authentication, potentially impacting organization-wide network connectivity and device provisioning. Organizations relying on Windows DHCP infrastructure face operational downtime risk that could affect hundreds of connected devices and network availability.
Apply vendor patch. Interim mitigations pending patch deployment: restrict network access to DHCP server ports (UDP 67/68) using firewall rules to only authorized DHCP client subnets; disable external DHCP services if not required; implement network-layer rate limiting on DHCP traffic; monitor DHCP server logs for abnormal request patterns indicative of denial-of-service activity.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2025-17746
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB