Skip to main content

Windows CVE-2025-32725

| EUVDEUVD-2025-17746 HIGH
Protection Mechanism Failure (CWE-693)
2025-06-10 secure@microsoft.com
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) indicates high real-world exploitability: network accessibility from any source (AV:N), low attack complexity requiring no special conditions (AC:L), no privileges or authentication needed (PR:N/UI:N), and high availability impact (A:H) within the affected system. The absence of confidentiality or integrity impact (C:N/I:N) limits the vulnerability to denial-of-service rather than data breach. Risk assessment synthesis: (1) High exploitability factors: unauthenticated, network-accessible attack with low complexity; (2) Infrastructure criticality: DHCP is essential for network operations, and service denial affects all clients; (3) Missing signals: EPSS probability, KEV inclusion status, and POC availability are not provided, limiting quantification of active threat landscape; (4) SSVC assessment: exploitation is likely automatable given the network nature and lack of authentication, technical impact is high (service denial), affecting mission-critical infrastructure. Conservative assessment: CRITICAL priority given infrastructure role, despite limited data on active exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker positioned on the network (or external with network access) sends a crafted sequence of malformed or excessive DHCP requests to the Windows DHCP Server (UDP port 67). The vulnerability in the protection mechanism allows these requests to consume server resources without being properly rate-limited or validated. For example: (1) Attacker floods the DHCP server with DHCP DISCOVER packets with invalid or resource-intensive payloads; (2) Server's insufficient protection mechanism fails to drop/rate-limit these packets, causing memory exhaustion, CPU saturation, or state table overflow; (3) DHCP server becomes unresponsive, preventing legitimate clients from obtaining IP leases; (4) Network-connected devices lose connectivity or experience prolonged DHCP timeout delays, cascading to application failures and business disruption. The attack requires no authentication, user interaction, or special privileges—a single attacker script can impact entire network segments. Likelihood of POC: high, given the straightforward nature of network-based DoS attacks; exploit code likely exists in security research communities or will emerge post-disclosure.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 1.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 14, 2026

Network-accessible denial-of-service vulnerability in Windows DHCP Server caused by a protection mechanism failure (CWE-693), allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server availability without requiring authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability affects Windows DHCP Server implementations across multiple versions and has a CVSS severity of 7.5 (High). While the description does not explicitly reference KEV inclusion, active exploitation status, or EPSS data, the low attack complexity (AC:L) and network accessibility (AV:N) combined with no authentication requirements indicate this represents a credible denial-of-service threat to DHCP infrastructure.

RemediationAI

Immediate remediation steps: (1) Apply latest security patches from Microsoft for Windows DHCP Server—check Microsoft Security Bulletin and KB database for CVE-2025-32725 specific patch (expected in monthly Patch Tuesday releases); (2) Identify affected systems via Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager; (3) Test patches in non-production environments before broad deployment; (4) Temporary mitigations pending patches: implement network-level ingress filtering to restrict DHCP traffic (UDP 67/68) to authorized networks only, deploy rate-limiting rules on firewalls/network appliances to restrict DHCP request frequency, monitor DHCP server logs for anomalous request patterns, consider disabling DHCP Server role on non-essential systems. (5) Post-remediation: validate DHCP service stability and client connectivity after patching. Reference: Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) portal for official advisories, KB articles, and patch availability confirmation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.4349
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.7434
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.8148
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.8148
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.3807
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.7434
Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) 10.0.25398.0 <10.0.25398.1665
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.4349

Affected Packages

euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.8148
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.8148
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.7434
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.7434
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.3807
euvd windows_server_2022_23h2_edition_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.25398.1665
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.4349
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.4349

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 8 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This vulnerability resides in Windows DHCP Server, a critical network infrastructure service responsible for dynamic IP address allocation via the DHCP protocol (RFC 2131/2132 operating over UDP port 67/68). The root cause is classified under CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure), indicating insufficient safeguards against resource exhaustion, malformed packet handling, or inadequate request validation within the DHCP server's packet processing logic. The protection mechanism failure likely involves improper handling of DHCP requests that should be rate-limited, validated, or rejected, allowing an attacker to trigger excessive resource consumption (memory, CPU, or connection state). DHCP servers are fundamental network infrastructure present in virtually all enterprise environments; compromise of this service cascades to network unavailability.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Updated
Apr 16, 2026 - 06:42 EUVD-patch-fix
executive summary
Patch available
Apr 16, 2026 - 05:29 EUVD
10.0.26100.4349,10.0.17763.7434,10.0.14393.8148
CVE Published
Jun 10, 2025 - 17:22 nvd
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Protection mechanism failure in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2025-32725 is a network-accessible denial-of-service vulnerability in Windows DHCP Server that allows unauthenticated attackers to disrupt DHCP services without authentication, potentially impacting organization-wide network connectivity and device provisioning. Organizations relying on Windows DHCP infrastructure face operational downtime risk that could affect hundreds of connected devices and network availability.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. Interim mitigations pending patch deployment: restrict network access to DHCP server ports (UDP 67/68) using firewall rules to only authorized DHCP client subnets; disable external DHCP services if not required; implement network-layer rate limiting on DHCP traffic; monitor DHCP server logs for abnormal request patterns indicative of denial-of-service activity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.9%
Top 17% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +2
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy