Skip to main content
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

CVSS 8.7, EPSS 66.2%. F5 BIG-IP is deployed as the front door for enterprise applications, handling SSL termination, load balancing, and WAF functions. Compromise of BIG-IP provides access to TLS private keys (enabling traffic decryption), application server addresses (bypassing WAF), and the ability to modify traffic in transit.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with valid BIG-IP credentials (obtained through credential stuffing or phishing) uses the iControl REST API to issue a save command with injected shell code. The commands execute on the BIG-IP, and the attacker extracts TLS private keys, modifies load balancing rules to redirect traffic, and installs a persistent backdoor on the appliance.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: HIGH severity + EPSS > 10%.
No patch listed yet 66.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 28, 2026

F5 BIG-IP contains an authenticated command injection in the iControl REST API and TMOS Shell (tmsh) save command. Authenticated attackers can inject system commands through crafted save operations, executing arbitrary code on the BIG-IP appliance which typically handles load balancing and SSL termination for critical application infrastructure.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Mar 28, 2026 - 18:25 CVSS 8.7

Authenticated command injection in F5 BIG-IP iControl REST and tmsh save command enables arbitrary system command execution on the load balancer.

RemediationAI

Apply the latest F5 security hotfix. Restrict iControl REST access to management networks only. Implement multi-factor authentication for BIG-IP admin access. Monitor tmsh command logs for unusual save operations. Rotate TLS certificates if compromise is suspected.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The tmsh save command processes user-supplied parameters without adequate sanitization before passing them to underlying system commands. An authenticated user with access to iControl REST or tmsh can inject shell metacharacters that execute arbitrary commands. BIG-IP appliances run a modified Linux OS and the exploitation context provides access to TLS private keys, configuration secrets, and network traffic.

Know when Big Ip Advanced Web Application Firewall gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Command injection vulnerability exists in iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) save command, which may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary system commands.

Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2025-20029 presents significant security risk, a OS command injection vulnerability rated CVSS 8.7. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands on affected systems, potentially leading to full system compromise. With an EPSS score of 66%, this vulnerability faces very high likelihood of exploitation. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and consider compensating controls in the interim.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If immediate patching is not feasible: (1) Deploy WAF rules to block injection patterns; (2) Restrict network access to affected components; (3) Enable enhanced logging for suspicious activity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
66.2%
Top 1% exploitable
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 66.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity + EPSS > 10%
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Very High

Priority Score

110
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +66
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_advanced_firewall_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_analytics:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_acceleration_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_security_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_visibility_and_reporting:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_automation_toolchain:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_carrier-grade_nat:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_container_ingress_services:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_ddos_hybrid_defender:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_domain_name_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_edge_gateway:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_fraud_protection_service:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_global_traffic_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_link_controller:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_local_traffic_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_policy_enforcement_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_ssl_orchestrator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_webaccelerator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
+ 43 more
CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2025-53521 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Oct 15

F5 BIG-IP APM (Access Policy Manager) contains a remote code execution vulnerability triggered by specific malicious tra

CVE-2023-46747 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 26

Undisclosed requests may bypass configuration utility authentication, allowing an attacker with network access to the BI

CVE-2021-22986 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 31

On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.

CVE-2023-46748 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 26

An authenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Configuration utility which may allow an authenticated

CVE-2024-45844 HIGH POC
8.6 Oct 16

BIG-IP monitor functionality may allow an attacker to bypass access control restrictions, regardless of the port lockdow

CVE-2023-41373 CRITICAL
9.9 Oct 10

A directory traversal vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Configuration Utility that may allow an authenticated attacker

CVE-2021-23031 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 14

On version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.1, 13.1.x before 13.1.4, 12.1.x before 12.

CVE-2021-22987 CRITICAL
9.9 Mar 31

On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x

CVE-2021-22991 CRITICAL
9.8 Mar 31

On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.

CVE-2021-22992 CRITICAL
9.8 Mar 31

On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x

CVE-2021-23007 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Mar 31

On BIG-IP versions 14.1.4 and 16.0.1.1, when the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process handles certain undisclose

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy