Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as high-privilege admin
-
DeliverySave unsanitised XSS payload into plugin settings
-
ExploitPayload stored unescaped
-
ExecutionPrivileged user views settings page
-
ImpactScript executes in their session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated high-privilege user (administrator) to inject the payload into the plugin's unsanitised settings fields, and a second privileged user to subsequently render the affected settings page (UI:R). The vulnerability is only security-relevant where the unfiltered_html capability is withheld from admins - chiefly WordPress multisite networks; on a default single-site install an admin already has unfiltered_html and gains nothing. Affected: Business Name Generator plugin versions through 1.3. Limiting factors: high privilege prerequisite, required victim interaction, and the multisite/capability-restricted configuration dependency all sharply narrow real-world exploitability. |
| Impact | This is a low-priority, high-CVSS-noise-floor issue rather than a genuine threat. The CVSS 3.1 base score is only 3.5 (Low) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N - the PR:H (high privilege) and UI:R (user interaction) metrics are the dominant limiters. Exploitation requires an already-authenticated administrator to save a malicious value into plugin settings, which another privileged user must then view. No EPSS score is provided and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active or automatable exploitation; the only elevated signal is 'publicly available exploit code exists' (WPScan c6aa25a4), which is distinct from active exploitation. The core insight is trust boundary: on a standard single-site WordPress install an administrator already holds the unfiltered_html capability and can inject arbitrary script legitimately, so this flaw adds little there. Its real (still modest) value is in hardened multisite environments where even site admins are denied unfiltered_html - this bug bypasses that restriction. No signals conflict: the CVSS vector, POC-but-no-KEV status, and description are mutually consistent. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | In a WordPress multisite network where site administrators are stripped of the unfiltered_html capability, a malicious or compromised site admin enters a JavaScript payload into an unsanitised Business Name Generator settings field. When another privileged user (e.g., a network super-admin) later loads the plugin's settings page, the stored script executes in their browser session, potentially escalating toward network-level control. A public proof-of-concept for this input path is available via WPScan. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 19, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in the Business Name Generator WordPress plugin through version 1.3 allows an authenticated high-privilege user (administrator) to inject malicious script into the plugin's unsanitised settings fields, which then executes when a second privileged user renders the affected settings page. Publicly available exploit code exists, but exploitation is tightly constrained: it requires high privileges, victim interaction, and a configuration where the unfiltered_html capability is withheld from admins, chiefly WordPress multisite networks, making this a low-priority, high-CVSS-noise-floor issue rather than a genuine threat. No vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version was identified at time of analysis, so the primary action is to remove or disable the Business Name Generator plugin until a fixed version is published; if the plugin is essential, the residual risk must be accepted. Compensating controls: restrict access to the WordPress admin area and specifically the plugin's settings page to only the minimum number of trusted high-privilege users, acknowledging that this reduces but does not eliminate the attack surface because the attack requires an already-privileged user. On multisite networks, ensure that only super admins have unfiltered_html and audit administrator accounts for unnecessary privileges, with the trade-off of increased administrative overhead. A web application firewall with XSS filtering could help block payload delivery, but WAF signatures are not a substitute for patching and may produce false positives. Monitor the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c6aa25a4-c795-47e6-9d09-bebe4afc1a08/ and the NVD entry at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15698 for a fixed release. Because publicly available exploit code exists, review administrator access logs for suspicious changes to plugin settings.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability (CWE-79) in a WordPress plugin's administrative settings interface. Business Name Generator registers settings fields that are saved without proper sanitisation or output escaping, so an attacker who can edit those fields can store JavaScript that later renders in the settings page for any user who loads it. The assessed CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N confirms a network vector, high privileges required, required victim interaction, and low confidentiality and integrity impact. The key limiting factor is WordPress's unfiltered_html capability: on a standard single-site install, administrators already possess this capability and can post unfiltered HTML, so the flaw adds no practical escalation; on multisite networks, only super admins retain unfiltered_html, and the vulnerability becomes relevant because the plugin fails to enforce capability checks. CPE data lists cpe:2.3:a:unknown:business_name_generator:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* with an unknown vendor and wildcard version, and EUVD records affected versions as Business Name Generator 0 through 1.3. WPScan is credited as the reporter, and its advisory entry is tagged as an exploit reference with publicly available exploit code.
Know when Business Name Generator gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Requires authenticated admin to store the payload (PR:H) and a victim to view the page (UI:R); stored XSS yields limited client-side confidentiality/integrity impact, no availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
The Business Name Generator WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup).
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2025-210971
GHSA-j4x3-rc4j-f623
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB