Skip to main content

TP-Link Omada CVE-2025-15628

| EUVDEUVD-2025-210610 HIGH
Use of Hard-coded Credentials (CWE-798)
2026-08-03 TPLink GHSA-8mhg-76f5-54fp
8.2
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: TPLink
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Extract shared certificate from any Omada firmware
  2. Delivery
    Gain adjacent network access to management segment
  3. Exploit
    Deploy rogue Omada controller with extracted certificate
  4. Execution
    Managed devices authenticate rogue controller as trusted
  5. Persist
    Intercept controller-to-device management communications
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate credentials and network configuration

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Credential externalization
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Persistence, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to first obtain the shared embedded certificate material, which can be extracted from any Omada-family device's firmware (gateways, switches, APs, OLTs, or controllers) - this is the primary enabling condition. The attacker must then achieve adjacent network positioning on the Omada management network segment (AV:A), such as by compromising a host that can reach controller-to-device communication paths or by physically connecting to the management VLAN. The CVSS 4.0 UI:P qualifier indicates a managed device must initiate a connection to the rogue controller (passive interaction), but this occurs automatically in normal Omada polling behavior and does not require any administrator action. Exploitation is NOT limited to specific configuration settings or non-default deployment modes - the shared certificate design is inherent to all Omada firmware. The meaningful limiting factor is network adjacency: attackers without access to the Omada management segment cannot exploit this remotely over the internet.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.2 with AV:A (adjacent network) meaningfully bounds real-world exposure: exploitation requires the attacker to already have a foothold on the same network segment as Omada management traffic, limiting mass internet exploitation. However, once adjacent, AC:L and AT:N confirm the attack itself is straightforward with no exploit complexity - certificate possession is the only gate. The UI:P qualifier in CVSS 4.0 (passive interaction) suggests a victim device or controller must initiate a connection, which is expected behavior in normal Omada controller-device polling, making this practically exploitable without any user action in typical deployments. High confidentiality impact on both vulnerable (VC:H) and subsequent (SC:H) systems reflects that intercepted management traffic likely contains credentials, network topology, and device configurations. No EPSS score was provided in the source data, and the CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog, so exploitation probability signals are limited to the CVSS vector analysis. The authentication-bypass tag and shared-certificate design mean a single compromised or publicly leaked firmware image could expose all Omada customers - a supply-chain-style amplifier that elevates real-world risk above what the AV:A vector alone implies.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with access to any Omada device - acquired legitimately, via purchase, or by exploiting a separate vulnerability - extracts the shared embedded certificate from its firmware. The attacker then connects to a target organization's Omada management network segment (via a compromised host, rogue device, or physical access) and stands up a rogue controller presenting the extracted certificate. Managed Omada devices authenticate the rogue controller as trusted and begin reporting to it, enabling the attacker to intercept management traffic including network credentials and configuration data. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis, but firmware extraction from TP-Link devices is a documented research activity.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 03, 2026

Shared embedded certificates across all TP-Link Omada deployments enable impersonation of trusted controllers and managed devices by any attacker who extracts those certificates from a single unit. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/PR:N/VC:H/SC:H) confirms that an unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access to the Omada management plane can intercept management communications at high confidentiality impact across both the vulnerable and subsequent systems, with no patch complexity required beyond certificate possession. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and this CVE is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog, though the authentication-bypass tagging and the breadth of affected product lines (gateways, switches, access points, controllers, OLTs) give this meaningful real-world weight in environments relying on Omada for network management.

RemediationAI

The vendor has released a patch; administrators should immediately download updated firmware for all affected Omada product types (gateways, switches, access points, controllers, and OLTs) from https://www.omadanetworks.com/us/support/download/ and consult the TP-Link advisory at https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5216/ for product-specific fix versions and update sequencing guidance. An exact patched firmware version was not independently enumerated in the available input data, so administrators must verify the minimum acceptable version directly from the advisory before deploying. As a compensating control prior to patching, isolate the Omada management network on a dedicated VLAN with strict ACLs permitting only known controller-to-device communication paths, and block lateral access from untrusted segments; this raises the bar for the AV:A prerequisite but does not eliminate the vulnerability since insider or compromised-host attackers may still satisfy the adjacency condition. Monitoring for unexpected devices presenting Omada controller certificates on the management plane can serve as a detection signal.

Affected VersionsENISA

Omada Access Points 0
Omada Switches 0
Omada Controllers 0
Omada OLTs 0
Omada gateways 0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-798 (Use of Hard-coded Credentials) describes the root cause: TP-Link embedded identical certificates into firmware shipped across all Omada product families rather than issuing per-device or per-deployment certificates. The Omada ecosystem uses a controller-to-device trust model where controllers manage gateways, switches, access points, and OLTs; this trust is validated via the embedded certificates. Because the same certificate material is present in every unit shipped, extraction from a single device - via firmware unpacking or device compromise - yields a credential that is valid against every other Omada deployment globally. Affected CPEs span the full product stack: cpe:2.3:a:tp-link_systems_inc.:omada_gateways, omada_switches, omada_access_points, omada_controllers, and omada_olts, all with wildcard version strings indicating the issue is not constrained to a specific firmware branch.

Know when Omada Gateways gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (TPLink) PRIMARY 8.2 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.6 MEDIUM

Adjacent vector matches AV:A from 4.0; UI:R reflects passive-but-required device connection initiation; scope change and high confidentiality capture cross-system management traffic interception.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (TPLink).

CVSS VectorVendor: TPLink

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Affected Omada devices rely on embedded certificates that are shared across deployments to establish trust between controllers and managed devices.

An attacker who obtains the embedded certificates may be able to impersonate trusted controllers or devices and intercept affected communications.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

TP-Link Omada network management infrastructure uses shared embedded certificates across all customer deployments, allowing unauthenticated attackers with network access to impersonate legitimate controllers and intercept management communications affecting gateways, switches, access points, and OLTs. Organizations relying on Omada for network policy enforcement face confidentiality compromise and potential manipulation of network management traffic. This vulnerability creates organizational risk proportional to how extensively Omada manages critical network infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular SMB and branch-office networking platform, not enterprise-dominant
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +41
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy