Skip to main content

AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer CVE-2025-12381

MEDIUM
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2025-12-09 security.vulnerabilities@algosec.com
6.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: algosec
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local CLI account on host
  2. Delivery
    Identify sudoers-approved command
  3. Exploit
    Inject malicious parameters into command
  4. Execution
    Command executes as root
  5. Impact
    Full privilege escalation to root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the attacker already possess a local, low-privileged command-line account on the AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer host (AV:L, PR:L) AND that the deployment's sudoers file grant that account permission to run the specific vulnerable command - this non-default sudoers configuration is the explicit precondition ('abusing the parameters of a command that is approved in the sudoers file') and corresponds to the AT:P attack requirement in the vendor's CVSS 4.0 vector. Limiting factors: no remote exploitation is possible (local access mandatory), the attacker must hold valid credentials to the host, and the specific command must be whitelisted in sudoers; only versions A33.0 and A33.10 are listed as affected.

Impact

This is a genuine but bounded-priority issue - a local privilege escalation, not a remotely exploitable flaw. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:A/AT:P) confirms the attacker must already be a local, authenticated low-privileged user with command-line access, which sharply limits the population of potential attackers to those who already have a foothold. The signals are internally consistent and point to low urgency: EPSS is only 0.16% (5th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code was identified, so this is not under active exploitation. The CVSS base score of 6.1 (Medium) is driven mainly by the high integrity/availability/subsequent-system impact (VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H) of gaining root, offset by the local-only access and the attack requirement (AT:P) that a specific command be present in the sudoers file. Net assessment: a real defense-in-depth concern for hardening privileged hosts, but a high-CVSS-but-low-real-risk profile for most organizations rather than an emergency, since it requires prior local access and a non-default sudoers configuration. No signals conflict; the main limitation is that the only reference is the vendor advisory, with no independent corroboration of affected-version boundaries.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An employee or contractor who already holds a standard shell account on an AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer Linux host notices that a particular command is whitelisted for them via sudo. They craft malicious parameters (parameter injection) to that approved command, causing it to execute attacker-controlled actions as root and escalating from a low-privileged account to full administrative control of the appliance. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and because the attack vector is local (AV:L) the attacker must first obtain CLI access.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026

Local privilege escalation in AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer A33.0 and A33.10 allows a local, low-privileged user with command-line access to abuse parameters of a sudoers-approved command to gain elevated privileges, potentially impacting subsequent systems. Exploitation requires a non-default sudoers configuration that whitelists the vulnerable command, and no public exploit code is identified. EPSS score is low at 0.16% (5th percentile), indicating limited perceived risk.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is identified in the provided data; consult the vendor advisory at https://techdocs.algosec.com/en/cves/Content/tech-notes/cves/cve-2025-12381.htm for patched version availability. Until a patch is applied, reduce risk by editing the sudoers file to remove the vulnerable command or restrict its allowed parameters using exact argument matching (e.g., require specific flags and file paths, avoid wildcards). Alternatively, remove the affected user's sudo permission for that command entirely, though this may break legitimate workflows. As a compensating control, restrict local console and SSH access to trusted users, and monitor sudo logs for anomalous command invocations. Note that these workarounds may impact operational tasks that rely on the command.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is an instance of CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) combined with parameter injection. In AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer on Linux 64-bit, a command that is allowed in the sudoers file can be invoked with attacker-controlled parameters, leading to execution of arbitrary commands or actions with elevated privileges. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A) indicates that a local, low-privileged user must have a command-line account, and the attack requires a non-default sudoers entry that grants permission to run the vulnerable command (AT:P). The independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms local access, low privileges, scope change, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. No remote exploitation is possible; the attack is bounded by the sudoers precondition. EPSS is 0.16% (5th percentile), and no public exploit code is identified.

Know when Firewall Analyzer gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (algosec) PRIMARY 6.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/RE:L/U:Amber
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Local low-privileged account required (AV:L, PR:L); straightforward parameter injection (AC:L); escalation to root crosses the sudo security boundary (S:C) yielding full host compromise (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (algosec).

CVSS VectorVendor: algosec

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer on Linux, 64 bit allows Privilege Escalation, Parameter Injection.

A local user with access to the command line may escalate their privileges by abusing the parameters of a command that is approved in the sudoers file. This issue affects Firewall Analyzer: A33.0, A33.10.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise firewall-policy management product, limited production footprint
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:algosec:firewall_analyzer:a33.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:algosec:firewall_analyzer:a33.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy