WatchGuard EPDR
CVE-2024-8424
HIGH
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege local Windows session
-
DeliveryIdentify running PSANHost.exe service
-
ExploitSend crafted IPC request to module
-
ExecutionTrigger SYSTEM-context file deletion
-
PersistDelete security logs or agent binaries
-
ImpactDisable endpoint defenses or destabilize host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an existing local user account on the Windows host - low-privileged access (standard domain or local user) is sufficient per the PR:L CVSS 4.0 metric. WatchGuard EPDR, Panda AD360, or Panda Dome must be installed and the PSANHost.exe module must be actively running as a service. No non-default product configuration is required; the privilege management flaw is present in the standard out-of-box product deployment. Exploitation is strictly local (AV:L) - remote unauthenticated attack is not possible. No user interaction is required once the attacker holds a local session. Exploitation is limited by the requirement for prior local access: this vulnerability cannot serve as an initial access vector and is only reachable after an attacker has already compromised a local account on the target endpoint. |
| Impact | The vendor-assigned CVSS 4.0 score of 8.5 with AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N reflects realistic exploitation parameters: local access only, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction required. The local attack vector (AV:L) is the primary mitigating factor limiting real-world blast radius - an attacker must already hold an authenticated session on the target Windows host. EPSS at 0.19% (9th percentile) is consistent with low observed exploitation interest and the local-only nature of the flaw. The vulnerability is absent from CISA KEV and no public POC has been identified, supporting a considered rather than emergency patching posture. The vendor-assigned VC:H (confidentiality impact) appears optimistic for a pure file-deletion primitive; confidentiality impact is plausible only if an attacker targets cached credentials, security logs, or sensitive application data for deletion to cover tracks, but direct data exfiltration is not described. The high integrity and availability impacts (VI:H/VA:H) are well-grounded: deleting DLLs, security agent binaries, or Windows system files can disable defenses or render the host unbootable. Net assessment: meaningful post-exploitation or lateral-movement escalation primitive, not a critical initial-access risk. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained a low-privileged Windows user session on a host running WatchGuard EPDR - via phishing payload, credential stuffing, or lateral movement - sends a crafted IPC request to PSANHost.exe, directing the SYSTEM-context agent to delete a target file outside the attacker's normal permission scope. The attacker could delete endpoint detection log files to blind the security stack before proceeding with additional post-exploitation activity, or delete critical DLLs to disable the security agent itself. No public proof-of-concept code exists at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 08, 2026
Arbitrary file deletion at SYSTEM privilege level is achievable on Windows endpoints running WatchGuard EPDR, Panda AD360, and Panda Dome through the PSANHost.exe module, affecting EPDR and AD360 before 8.00.23.0000 and Panda Dome before 22.03.00. A low-privileged local attacker exploits CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management in the security agent process to coerce SYSTEM-context file deletion of arbitrary targets - including security tool components, audit logs, or critical OS files. No active exploitation is confirmed and no public exploit code has been identified; EPSS sits at 0.19% (9th percentile), indicating minimal current attacker interest.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patches: upgrade WatchGuard EPDR to 8.00.23.0000 or later, Panda AD360 to 8.00.23.0000 or later, and Panda Dome to 22.03.00 or later, as documented in WatchGuard advisory WGSA-2024-00017 at https://www.watchguard.com/wgrd-psirt/advisory/wgsa-2024-00017. Where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict interactive and remote local logon rights on endpoints running these products to only trusted, operationally necessary accounts using Group Policy (User Rights Assignment), reducing the pool of principals who could reach the vulnerable IPC interface - note this does not eliminate the flaw and increases operational friction for legitimate administration. Enable Windows file integrity auditing (auditpol /set /subcategory:'File System' /success:enable /failure:enable) with specific watches on PSANHost.exe's process ID to detect anomalous file deletion activity as a detection control.
Affected ProductsAI
WatchGuard EPDR versions prior to 8.00.23.0000 on Windows are affected. Panda AD360 versions prior to 8.00.23.0000 on Windows are affected. Panda Dome versions prior to 22.03.00 on Windows are affected. All three product lines share the vulnerable PSANHost.exe module. Vendor-confirmed details are available in the WatchGuard PSIRT advisory WGSA-2024-00017 at https://www.watchguard.com/wgrd-psirt/advisory/wgsa-2024-00017 and https://psirt.watchguard.com/CVE-2024-8424.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
PSANHost.exe is a core host-protection module in the WatchGuard/Panda endpoint security stack that runs with SYSTEM-level privileges as a Windows service. CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) indicates the module exposes a file-operation interface - likely via a named pipe, COM object, or local IPC mechanism - that fails to enforce adequate caller authorization before executing file deletion operations in the SYSTEM security context. Because the module inherits broad OS privileges by design (as a security agent), the misconfiguration allows any low-privileged local process or user to direct the agent to delete files that the calling principal would not normally be permitted to remove. All three affected product lines - WatchGuard EPDR (enterprise EDR), Panda AD360 (identity/AD-focused protection), and Panda Dome (consumer/SMB endpoint protection) - share the same vulnerable PSANHost.exe component on Windows.
Know when Watchguard gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local vector and PR:L match description; no scope change as impact stays within the host; C:N since only file deletion (not exfiltration) is described.
Primary rating from Vendor (5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3).
CVSS VectorVendor: 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in WatchGuard EPDR, Panda AD360 and Panda Dome on Windows (PSANHost.exe module) allows arbitrary file delete with SYSTEM permissions. This issue affects EPDR: before 8.00.23.0000; Panda AD360: before 8.00.23.0000; Panda Dome: before 22.03.00.
Executive ViewAI
A vulnerability in WatchGuard EPDR, Panda AD360, and Panda Dome allows local users to delete security tool components and critical system files, potentially disabling active endpoint protection and tampering with audit logs needed for forensic investigation. This directly compromises organizations' ability to detect threats in real-time and investigate security incidents after the fact. No patch is currently available, making immediate implementation of compensating controls essential.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement interim controls: restrict local logon privileges and administrative account access via Group Policy; deploy host-based endpoint detection and response monitoring for PSANHost.exe privilege escalation and file deletion attempts; enable file integrity monitoring on security tool installation directories and system-critical paths; enforce application control policies to restrict code execution; audit and reduce local administrator account creation and privilege delegation; enable logging and alerting on failed privilege escalation attempts and suspicious file operations targeting security tool binaries or audit log locations.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
More in Watchguard
View allWatchGuard Fireware OS contains an out-of-bounds write in IKEv2 VPN handling enabling unauthenticated remote code execut
Watchguard XCS 9.2 and 10.0 before build 150522 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via shell
Buffer overflow in WGagent in WatchGuard WSM and Fireware before 11.8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code
Remote code execution in WatchGuard Fireware OS arises from an out-of-bounds write in the iked (IKE) daemon, letting an
SQL injection vulnerability in Watchguard XCS 9.2 and 10.0 before build 150522 allows remote attackers to execute arbitr
On WatchGuard Firebox and XTM appliances, an unauthenticated user can execute arbitrary code, aka FBX-22786. Rated criti
An issue was discovered on WatchGuard AP100, AP102, and AP200 devices with firmware before 1.2.9.15. Rated critical seve
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Hexis HawkEye G 3.0.1.4912 allow remote attackers to hijac
An issue was discovered on WatchGuard AP100, AP102, and AP200 devices with firmware before 1.2.9.15, and AP300 devices w
WatchGuard RapidStream appliances allow local users to gain privileges and execute arbitrary commands via a crafted ifco
Panda Endpoint Administration Agent before 7.50.00, as used in Panda Security for Business products for Windows, uses a
Panda Security URL Filtering before 4.3.1.9 uses a weak ACL for the "Panda Security URL Filtering" directory and install
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB